I raised this issue at the CAC meeting last week, asking the chair to get the issue sorted. I have walked that path three times over the last three weeks and have had to divert through the farmers field as the footpath is impassable. The framer has tried to secure the gate so that too is impassable but with not much success. DTC have an obligation to ensure all footpaths are passable.
It is quite clear from the response here, that it is very much undedcided and split between what should happen. So take it to a public poll I say, if Dawlish want's it they will turn up, if they don't they won't.
All great, but should we really be allowing another refreshment facility in the area, let's be fair, those offering teas, coffees and icereams are already struggling the competetion wars.
Well let's hope the rent is paid and that no more trees are felled in that area.
Brooklyn Bridge It sounds to me that if you knew of some local authority was breaking the law, you would turn a blind eye. Not for me I'm afraid. There are two cases on going at the moment (there may be others) where it could cost DCC millions and that cost will eventually land in your lap. Remember Government and local authorities can only spend money that you give them. No wonder care homes are ...
With all due respect Brooklyn Bridge, don't read the thread if it doesn't interest you.
With all due respect would the two of you give it a rest. Just agree to disagree for crying out loud.
I have to agree with DEEDOODLE except on one point. I have already mentioned that there is a difference between car park conditions and on street parking conditions. Car parks run by local authorities can do virtually what they like with income raised either by parking charges or income from PCN's. But on street is another matter as to what is done with the income raised and how it is ...
Simple, money, money, money.
So Diana Mond does not know the motives behind the terms and conditions, pity that, because how can anyone have a meaningful debate on this subject if the prime antagonist to it does not provide answers to questions and continues to go around in circles declaring that answers have been given. So I will ask one more time. What is the motive behind a LA not giving the motorist the right to ...