Dawlish News

Newshound

People

Sarah Finneran
Netiquette
sarahsmithuk
Dil
Geoff King
1263
Kwhatley
Doc
GeorgeOgrady
DAF

Posts on Dawlish News

But to get back to the Sangs provision and this development. As nothing is yet in the public domain about where the Sangs provision for the Shutterton Park development is going to be, I imagine that Redrow and TDC are presently in discussion/negotiations about this (S106 agreement allows for the developer to provide the Sangs providing TDC approves of location and access etc if Warren Farm ...

that joke is a hole in one,

You are so utterly predictable, Oursoul.

OurSoul
OurSoul
2 days ago

I'm not trying to fool anyone Burneside. And everyone's allowed to break their diet now and again, aren't they? x

burneside
burneside
2 days ago

I thought you were only posting on Wednesdays, OurSoul?  And by the way, you aren't fooling anybody, I don't believe for one moment that this is your first incarnation on this forum.

OurSoul
OurSoul
2 days ago

Your cynicism re S106 was clearly misplaced Lynne.

Lynne
Lynne
3 days ago

S106 agreement for this development can be found by: clicking on this link http://gis.teignbridge.gov.uk/TeignbridgePlanningOnline/Results.aspx?Type=Application&Refval=12/02281/MAJ then click on associated documents then click on S106 agreement Lots of info re developer S106 obligations including options on how the Sangs requirement can be provided

3 days ago

and from the same Planning Inspector's report (again my emphasis in bold) 12.64 I am satisfied that the terms of the S.106 Agreement entered into by the appellant and the Council [INQ 21] ensure that adequate provision of SANGS would be put in place prior to the occupation of the proposed dwellings [10.5 – 10.7], and the other relevant financial contributions would be paid at ...

3 days ago

@FB As I understand the situation, Redrow can build the houses but those houses cannot be occupied unless and until the appropriate amount of Sangs is in place as required for this first phase, and then more Sangs again as required for any futher phases of development. BTW - the last I heard (about two weeks ago), and from the horses mouth as it were, the Weeks family still have no wish to ...

FredBassett
FredBassett
3 days ago

@Lynne Surely this means that until Redrow come up with their own solution to the SANGS issue they cannot start work on site. Hope Redrow and TDC have been made aware of this. Secondly why is the section 106 money not being spent locally.

Similar to Dawlish News