This site uses cookies

General Discussion

Yep! checked it out photographed it but did not measure the lengths to see if they are as stated in the CTRO. They maybe, but then again they maybe not.

Hello Roy! I think you will find this story has shot your praises about CCTV in Dawlish to bits. I could say CCTV is working, but where is the evidence? Saying what they do is only justifying their existence. The only evidence I have seen regarding CCTV in Dawlish, is that it cost the taxpayer close on £100,000 and now we have some carrot by the name of Hazel Percy (an ex Cllr) asking how we are ...

All my bagging on about bent MP's and Councillors are finally being exposed. I do hope the likes of Roy and many others who have been knocking my comments, will now sit up and take notice. Robbing a bank and then paying it all back is alright ....is it? Not in my book. TWO South Devon MPs at the centre of expense claim revelations have insisted they will still stand at the next general election. ...

TDC UNDERHAND METHODS
17 May 2009

Thanks must then go to the person that worked tirelessly to get it listed.

16 May 2009

Mr B Connett was a party to making the cricket field smaller in the first place - he is leader of the Teignbridge Council you know! He knew and does know what is going on. It is well known, that in spite of his best efforts - by saying Sandy Lane is not for sale, would not back the proposal to make Sandy Lane, "Village Green status", which would have protected it in law. I know laws can be change ...

15 May 2009

Apologising is a sign of weakness, that is why politicians have difficulty in saying they are sorry. Some may say it, but do they mean it?

Yes I heard that as well. And people vote these people into office - no wonder the country is in such a state? When Tony Blaire said, "Education, Education, Education, he didn't mean it. You only need to look at the bloke that is standing as a lib dem for Devon County Council to represent Dawlish. Somebody one day will help us.

15 May 2009

Mr Richard Younger-Ross no less has been found out and is going to pay back £4000 that he spent on luxury items that he did not think were luxury at the time he put in his claim for expenses. If he doesn't know what is luxury and what is not,how can he tell the difference between a theft and something borrowed? Four mirrors costing £1,235. £1,120 on a hi-fi. A 3%00 bookcase. and £1,475 chest of ...

Who in their right mind would want to spend nearly half a million quid on a property in that location?

Roy and Viaduct
13 May 2009

frannie, There is a prostitution (prosecution) lawyer and a dreadful (Defense) lawyer, always two sides to any argument. Once you have made up your mind on which side to take, you think the other side should be banished from this earth. Dictators take that view.

Similar to General Discussion