This site uses cookies

General Discussion

@Carer for the future you have to be logged on to facebook for flo's link to work.

Have a read http://www.dawlishnewspapers.co.uk/Letters.cfm?id=28539&headline=Our side of the story

Warren Farm
27 Feb 2015

So Mr Cox is doing his best to Kill the businesses' down at the Warren, what a thicko. Any day now will TDC get out the barbed wire to close off the Warren

@Lynne to the best of my knowledge there was going to be no through route between the two sites and that was suposed to be a condition of the strongvox and bovis / cavanna applications.

26 Feb 2015

Was that car park supposed to have been part of the Buntings site.

Solar panels should only be on roof tops, and it should be law that all new builds have to be built with them installed.

So the Cirl Buntings will get a good payment from this to be able to go and populate somewhere else. Just as long as they do not pick on another piece of land that some landowner / developer has their eyes on for future developement.

@JC It was me that said money talks and as usual you get totally the wrong end of the blog and twist things the wrong way. Money talks refers to the additional council tax, Section 106 money, CIL. That is  all Teignbridge is interested in, and as to the Bats and the Buntings has any body from the planning dept or the developers even thought about destroying their habitat, I don't think so.

Invest in the infrastructure first not the other way around. We all know what councils and services are like , delay spending until the very last minute and let us the tax payer put up with the problems that arise.

Yet plans exist to build houses on land that is currently used by rare bats and Cirl Buntings in other parts of Dawlish, and it did not stop the whitehall wallies from granting permission for 270 houses at Shutterton despite local opposition, Planning it does not exsist money talks.

Similar to General Discussion