@Morty Vicker s. I just felt that Flo had a valid point. Those calling others whiners or a miserable lot because they would like some clarity regarding finances is hardly conducive to open discussion. Whether you agree with it or not some local people are very angry, so why antagonise them further? It's inevitable that this thread will produce discussion on that matter. Why not start ...
@Neo You don't strike me as being the sort of person to want to stifle discussion. I hope that's clearer for you.
@Morty Vicker s. that makes little sense 'sonny jim'.
@flo it's a discussion. you know, a two way (or more) thing. are you seriously saying that we're not allowed to publish both sides of the story? wow. just wow. @Neo. You might want to consider practicing what you preach Sonny Jim.
@flo , well put.
Let's be fair. The title of this thread indicates what is being discussed. If you're not interested in the thread, don't read or reply to it. Simple. Walk away and do something more interesting, you're not obliged to get involved.
@Lynne That footer is probably a bog standard one that you'll find at the bottom of most emails from large organisations. Seriously LN, it's nothing sinister, and definitely won't be specific to the email you've received. There's nothing, legally, to stop you sharing the info. As it happens, we'll all know in 3 days time anyway! So why the biggy? @BEE9 DJ isn't the one doing the ...
Is DJ really the Earl of Devon or Jeremy Christophers?
@DJ - because i wanted to know, that's why. As far as I am concerned the info that the BBC sent me should be in the public domain and without me or anyone else having to ask for it.
@DJ ..stop whining, you are sounding more like morty. if someone wanted the info it is not down to you to whine on about why they want it.