This site uses cookies

General Discussion

Councillor Behaviour
13 Mar 2015

If I'm reading minutes correctly, the "other councillor" was Terry Lowther. If I'm not, apologies to him. The 'working' party membership list is posted on this forum somewhere. However it would appear that one member of it lacks the degree of knowledge required in order to make me feel comfortable that our Lawn is in safe hands.

Thank you Webmaster for restoring my post that immediately precedes the reply from our conscientious councillor. x

I've just seen that their rattling tins state that they're "Registered in Wales", whilst other documents correctly state "Registered in England and Wales". My understanding is that you can only state the former if you are registered in Wales, and last time I looked Teignmouth was definitely in Devon. I trust that this is just a printing error on the part of the Carnival company (literacy isn't ...

Councillor Behaviour
13 Mar 2015

May I ask if he was that clear, then why wasn't it recorded in the minutes of that meeting?  Or if his report was accidentally missed off them, why were the minutes approved during Septembers meeting (by those in attendance, obviously)?  Thanks.

...

In my opinion, the Carnival company had their last chance last year. The procession was good thanks to the visiting floats, however the rest of it was an amateurish shambles. And of course they have continued to use the float (the people's float) for their personal use.

Councillor Behaviour
13 Mar 2015

Thanks Michael. As long as that passion doesn't then transfer itself to rudeness.

13 Mar 2015

Thanks Michael. So it's clear then that there are lies, damned lies, and statistics. I assume that Councillor Clemens was indulging in a little bit of anti-independent electioneering. Ever the was with party politicians...

12 Mar 2015

If the report in the Gazette on the recent council meeting is to be believed, what a sorry state of affairs. Whilst on on the subject of the Gazette, could someone please explain how the figures printed in the article about the pavilion consultation differ so greatly to those initially announced. I just want an objective explanation and no bitching please. Thanks.

Brilliant! Another post arbitrarily removed by the machine. Brilliant!

Similar to General Discussion