This site uses cookies

General Discussion

My Kind

280
23
Joey Deacon
Joey Deacon
06 Aug 2008 23:02

What does delusional Anon/Roy/Jess mean by this "my kind" that he keeps harping on about yet never explains?

A lack of reply from him we can assume denotes a lack of cogent thinking. A lack of intelligence. A lack of soul. A lack of backbone.

Or that it's gone past 10pm again and he's had to go to bed again.

Viaduct
Viaduct
07 Aug 2008 08:12

It is becoming quite obvious that Joey Deacon is the result of a failed abortion.
There was no hope then and no hope now.

anon
anon
07 Aug 2008 12:55

that is sooo childish

anon
anon
07 Aug 2008 14:33

Yes we'll definitely keep this thread near the top, as it shows Roy/Viaduct/Anon/Jess in his true colours - for all to see.

Well done.

anon
anon
07 Aug 2008 15:00

I reckon if Viaduct would walk off into the sea the rest of the rats may just follow.

anon
anon
07 Aug 2008 15:03

its the cockroaches in the manor council chamber you should be eradicating.

Viaduct
Viaduct
07 Aug 2008 18:36

Oh dear! the carnival week is almost here and some are getting rather excited.
The carbon foot-print does not mean alot to the carnival organisers does it?
Drawing in crowds from god know's where by gaz guzzlers, to see the same ole airshow, guzzling more fuel. All the ooh's and ah's to go with it.
For what?
Sad ole world in't it.
I'm off to the Haytor party where I can take my firkin of cider, get pissed and not have a care in the world.
Anyone care to join the rest of the drop outs, party starts 1300hrs Saturday. No crowd control needed there and no need to look at the floats that are an excuse for a carnival procession in Dawlish.

anon
anon
07 Aug 2008 20:55

Have a great time! how is Mr Deacon going to be able to respond to our postings this coming week? Surely he is gonna be too busy as one of Wally Protheroe's foot-soldiers (in his minion uniform) collecting Admin monies? What an existence!

anon
anon
07 Aug 2008 22:13

looks like he's busy licking that protheroe backside

anon
anon
07 Aug 2008 22:14

must be birdsey

anon
anon
07 Aug 2008 22:27

wonder what him and walter are watching on that warren camera? the authorities may be very interested

anon
anon
07 Aug 2008 22:29

birdsey installed that camera, god knows what they asre looking at on dawlish warren beach?!

Chicken shed
Chicken shed
08 Aug 2008 09:57

Blimey Roy you have been talking to yourself alot.At least you managed to spell Viaduct , instead of anon all the while. It breaks the monotony of your boring pots. How about a bit of cutting and pasting today, that was really worth while, made you look an even bigger hypocrit than usual.

anon
anon
08 Aug 2008 13:01

Bumped to the top.

Read the first post by Viaduct to understand the bitter callousness of this Dawlish-hater.

anon
anon
08 Aug 2008 13:06

better still....look at all the devious tricks used by Councillors/Roundtablers/Rotarians to line their pockets with your money while they pretend to represent everyone else.

40 per cent of money collected during Carnival Week does not go to Charity......it goes into the pockets of Roundtable/Rotary......FACT.

anon
anon
08 Aug 2008 13:11

Can you please present evidence to back up what you call a fact? You're making very serious allegations against named individuals, but you haven't presented any evidence.

A link to a website showing this evidence would be useful.

Thank you.

anon
anon
08 Aug 2008 13:13

serious and true! about time this scam was exposed.

Joey Deacon
Joey Deacon
08 Aug 2008 14:55

Where's the evidence?

As per the earlier poster, I'm also asking you to please provide a link to a website to demonstrate your allegation having a single grain of truth about it.

What made you pluck 40% as a figure off the top of your head? Why not 50%? Why not 30%?

Viaduct
Viaduct
08 Aug 2008 16:34


Because 40% is what they can take to cover expenses. (Charity Commision web site.)

Who know's what the real cost of their expenses are?
Therein lies a clue to your answer in the above question.

Why did Teignmouth CCTV cost £35,00 for twelve cameras, yet Dawlish forked out £80,000+ for six?
Who was on the receiving end of that brown envelope I wonder?

Joey Deacon
Joey Deacon
08 Aug 2008 16:56

Where's your evidence that the person's you have publicly named are taking 40% of the charitable donations?

I don't want "clues", it's evidence that's needed.

And I tell you what, if you provide evidence I will back you up on this 100%. However, please remember that this evidence needs to exist out here in the real world and not just inside the head of one person.

I look forward to reading it.

B Green
B Green
08 Aug 2008 19:11

Have been reading comments. Mr Deacon you state that you would back exposure of anyone found to be involved in corruption 100% and yet your postings are all pro-council. A contrary response, would you not agree? The likes of Viaduct and Roy are at least definite in their arguments, but what, may I ask, is your agenda?

B.G.

Joey Deacon
Joey Deacon
08 Aug 2008 21:07

Like 99.99% of the population of our great country, I don't have or need an agenda. And I certainly don't feel as if I'm missing out by not having one.

Not if having an agenda makes one as bitter, twisted and myopic as certain people we could mention, "B. Green".

However, given evidence I will always examine that evidence and if it proves conclusive will do whatever is within my limited powers to ensure that the culpable party is brought to justice (in the real world).

And no, policeman isn't another job that should be added to my ever-growing CV!

Oh and to say that all my postings are "pro-council" is yet another lie. I think you'll find that I've posted on more subjects than just the council. It's not me that's the blinkered obsessive.

So. Where's the evidence, "B. Green"?

The "thousands of visitors" to this forum are all waiting on the edges of their seats...

anon
anon
08 Aug 2008 21:11

Scumbag Roy has changed his name again.

Comment Please sign in or sign up to post